This will help combat the AF speed reduction and finally ALWAYS stop the lens down further than you would do in that same situation of you were NOT using the extender. The lens release button on the MKIIIs is also larger than on the previous version and it feels a lot nicer under the thumb in operation. That said, the MkIII also has significant improvements over the MkII where AF is concerned.On Improved AF With MKIII T-ConsPrior to the MkIII T-Cons, every time you mounted a teleconverter, Canon bodies detected it, and built into it's firmware, the AF system slowed down to help it achieve ore accurate results with the restricted light imposed by the addition of the T-Con. You are using an out of date browser. This was just a quick look to satisfy my curiosity.
There are a lot of factors to consider when choosing between the Canon 1.4 Extender II and III models. The Canon Extender EF 1.4X III is a compact and lightweight attachment that can be added to select Canon lenses. On the question of 1.4x vs. 2x, the image quality of my 1.4x is far superior to either the EF 2x or EF 2x III that I tested at comparable focal lengths. I have a suitable 70-200 L lens, but noticed that the older II versions are considerably cheaper. IMG9 = new Image(604, 404)
The minimum focus distance of this lens is 95cm, giving you the ability to get close to your subject matter while still being able to frame them perfectly in the shot. -(older) versionsofthe following: Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens
So again, with the mirror-less bodies, none of the AF advantages of the MKIII t-cons are manifest. Of course, there are some trade-offs when using an extender. So there you have it a quick guide on how to use Canons 1.4x extenders! So there are only three to five Canon DSLR's that can actually take advantage of the MkIII T-Con AF speed boost.As for EOS R mirror-less? So if you attach a 1.4x Extender to that same 100mm lens at /2.8, it will now be /4- not as bright as it was before. In order to maintain backward firmware compatibility, a performance ceiling must be established. A significant disadvantage brought by the use of a 2x extender (any of brand or model of them) is that your lens' max aperture setting
--. -EF 28-70mm f/2.8L USM And as stated he didn't say thats the lens he would be using the TC with. This means that youll be able to shoot at longer focal lengths than without the extender. Cheers, C. I own a first generation Canon EF 2x. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM Lens
Has anyone out there tried both and able to offer an insight into whether the paying extra for the newer version is worthwhile? In the above photo the car is coming at me at at least 150MPH. The 2xIII works nicely on the 70-200II however focusing speed is reduced by 50% so be aware of that. Looks like the original 1.4 is not a bad choice, for the right price. (I owned the 400 and sold it quickly when I purchased the 500.). Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon EF 1.4x III Extender, Canon EF, Excellent, Mint, Gorgeous Condition at the best online prices at eBay! Free shipping for many products! CorrectYou can always use the kenko TCs, Sebastien5D mkIII ; 17-40L ; 24-105L ; 70-200L II ; 70-300L ; 35L ; 85/1.4 ; 135L ; 100macro ; Kenko 1.4x ; 2x mkIII ; 580EXIIM5 ; M1 ; 11-22 ; 18-150 ; 22/2.0 ; EF adapter; Manfrotto LEDBenron Tripod; ThinkTank, Lowepro and Crumpler bags; Fjllrven backpack. 180mm f/3.5L Macro USM Lens: Yes Overall, the Canon Extender EF 1is a well-built and effective way to increase your lens focal length by 1 47). Canon EF 200mm f/2.0L IS USM Lens
Quantaray lens 70-300 macro I don't use extenders a big percentage of the time, but I often have a 1.4x with me. As for the improved optics, most reviewers have indicated that the difference in IQ between the 1.4x II and III is pretty slight, while the difference between the 2x II and III is more noticeable. but it comes with an image quality penalty. f/4 on a tripod, and shot at an item about 50' away. The 2X III just hunts on my 35-350 L . Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens
There is a used 2x II in my area right now, so wondering what would be the downsides with the II compared to the III . -The minimum focus distance with the extender attached . For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. There's a MkI for sale near me. Is the 1.4 v III extender worth the extra $170? I need more reach. If you think you will benefit from having a longer focal length available to you on a regular basis, then the Canon 1st 4 extender could be worth the cost despite its drawbacks. In this post, well be taking a detailed look at the Canon Extender EF 1.4X III. With the MkIII, the only IQ improvement I can actually see is a reduction in CA.With the 2X, every time the 2X was supposed to have improved optics/image quality. So, which one should you get? Slower subjects could possible yield even sharper results ! The 2x II added pincushion distortion to the lens it was used with whereas the 2x version III adds slight barrel distortion. function switchimage(imgDocID, imgObjName) {
Here are some tips to get you started. Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens
With the MKIII T-Cons and the most modern DSLR AF Systems these "brakes" were finally removed. A 2Xextender turns an f/4 lens into an f/8 lens, and that's an iffy proposition, even on a 7D2. IMG7.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-14x.jpg'
The Canon EF 2x III Extender does not go with me nearly as frequently, but I occasionally take it along too. The difference between the II and III is quite small as other's have pointed out and you'll be saving a fair amount of money especially if you pickup one a used one. This means that youll need to use faster shutter speeds or open up your aperture accordingly if you want to maintain the same exposure as without the extender attached. Next best option is to keep the 400/5.6 and use it with the 1.4x III. (again, use the mouseover feature) usually improves the image quality of both the bare lens and the extended lens combination. Thus, I depend solely on the commissions received from you using the links on this site to make any purchase. Shooting with the Canon EF 2x III Extender mounted results in reduction of autofocus speed. There are many factors to consider when choosing between the Canon 1.4 Extender II and III. I believe the OP has the older NON-L version of the 70-300 IS. In June 2011 I had the opportunity to head to France and shoot the 24 Hours of Le Mans, the worlds greatest motor race. Again, to my eyes, improvement has been minimal. Also impressive is the resulting image quality in these extender examples. IMG4.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-100.jpg'
5 U SM EFS 17 ~ 85 mmf ,f 4 . Thats all it is, a bit of fun. This Canon Extender 1.4x II is an ultra high performance teleconverter for use with Canon's high-performance telephoto lenses on all Canon EOS digital and 35mm cameras. The slight difference in color can be seen with the MKIII extender and this 500mm f4 L IS New larger lens release button on the MKIII versions MKIII on the left and MKII on the right. Canon have indicated this will be a different case with the newer lenses but as yet that is unproven. Attempting to mount a Canon extender on these same non-compatible lenses can damage the lens due to contact being made with the rear lens element. The III's new color matches Canon's latest white L lenses. But I notice no slow down in AF on the new 70-200 mk II . IMG3.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/2x-Extender.jpg'
Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 w/3265 ball-mount. The only advantage would be in the weather sealing arena. F8 is definitely a sweet spot though in these examples. 6lll&USMandIV -EFOO~ 200 mmf /4 .. 5 LUSMandlll&IV -EFS 10 ~ 22 mmf / 3 . Each row below the image represents either the bare lens or the lens with the specified extender mounted behind it. Extenders do not affect the MFD (Minimum Focus Distance) of the lens they are mounted behind,
the values to the right show Photoshop CS5 up-rezzed (resized larger) images created from the native image. Capture One is a, Theres a lot of debate in the photography world about which lens is better for Nikon cameras, the 17-55 or the 16-80. I would however use an extender if the sun is off at 90 degrees to my subject or more. Take this a useful guide but not necessarily gospel! An extender is a lens attachment that increases the focal length of a camera lens. so the MM (Maximum Magnification) of the lens is also multiplied by 2x. You can use natural light, artificial light, or a combination of both. Canon 1dmk4 , iso 2000 , f11, 1/800, 600mm (300mm + 2x MKIII). Keep in mind that you can probably buy the 1.4 and 2X II for the price of either III . The Canon Extender EF lenses are a group of teleconverter lenses made by Canon. Canon extender Mark III vs Mark II. The second is autofocus the III has much better autofocus performance than the II. The Canon EF 2x III Extender significantly extends the reach of your sharp, compatible Canon lenses for a relatively low size, weight, and financial cost -
MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Macro Photo Lens: Yes This is especially evident when photographing landscapes or, There are many photo editing software programs on the market today. In addition to having an impact on effective aperture, extenders can also impact the number of available AF points. There is only a very small improvement over the MKII versions and its only noticeable in certain situations. With Extender EF2X III, the maximum aperture will be smaller by 2 stops. All the new MKII IS super-tele lenses from Canon feature this new coloring so the MKIII extenders have been updated to match both the color and also the very slightly smoother design aesthetic of these lenses. Autofocus with Canon 1.4 Extender - Series II vs. Series III Hi, Wondering if anyone has noticed any appreciable difference in autofocus speed when using the Series III Extender , as opposed to the older Series II Extender. I've even considered getting Kenko TC's so I can use one on lenses like my 100mmL which does not work with Canon TC's. 5 ~ 4 . I have the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens, so after reading the replies I think I've decided on the 2x III. Starts improving from F/6.3 onwards till F/8.This leads to high ISO but used with R5 or R6 this will not lead to noise issues as these two mirrorless bodies handle high ISO very well as being reported. This was not always the case. Better optical quality is also expected. I'll let you decide which ones are . Well have to wait and see. Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens becomes a 360mm f/7.1 USM Macro Lens. Essentially, it magnifies the image that your lens is able to capture. Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L USM Lens (non-IS)
Extender Model: 1.4x II: 2x II: 1.4x III: 2x III: 1.4x II: 2x II: 1.4x III: 2x III: Actual Aperture: f/5.6: f/8: f/5.6 . Each has its pros and cons, so it really comes down to what youre looking for in a lens. Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens
If I had the money to spare and planned to upgrade to one of the new 500mm+ super telephotos, I would have kept the Mark III. At review time, the price differential between the still-available version II extenders and the version IIIs is rather high. It was however great for shooting the moon.I recently purchased the Canon R6 and have used both the 1.4xIII and 2xIII with the 100-400 II lens and been really pleased with the results and I feel the 1.4x III produces much better results on the R6.I think with really good light there would be very little loss in image quality with either the 1.4 or 2. But what lenses are compatible with the Extender II? What types of photography are extenders used for? This Canon Extender 2x II is an ultra high performance teleconverter for use with Canon's high-performance telephoto lenses on all Canon EOS digital and 35mm cameras. I could not see an appreciable difference in the AF speed and accuracy at all when used with current lenses. Not my current 7D unless I feel like manual focusing.Thanks! I think I am definitely more confident that the extenders will work well with my 100-400 II and R6 combo, and make me lean more towards the 1.4x as the priority. This may seem like a drawback, but in reality subject tracking performance remains quite high when Series III Extenders are used with IS II lenses. The lens mount release switch received a cosmetic upgrade, but functions the same. Said another way, you generally will get better results from a 400mm lens than with a 200mm lens plus the Canon EF 2x III Extender,
IMG10.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Lens-Only.jpg'
The Canon 1.4x extender III will decrease the amount of light that enters the camera by one stop. I traded in the 1.4 EX Mark II towards the purchase of the Mark III. Now these are some fast moving samples! There is very little difference to be seen in these samples but as I mentioned before , I feel that in my real world shots the MKIII was very slightly ahead in contrast at lower apertures. The image below was captured with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. To use extenders effectively though you have to understand their strengths and weaknesses. I've tried to do some research on this before posting, and the consensus of what I can see online is that:- For 1.4x the difference in IQ between the II and III is minimal- For the 2x the difference in IQ between the II and III is enough that it's worth getting the III over the II.Can anyone with experience with these extenders weigh in? It is more money, but the overtime earned from last month needs a home and I guess it's like a lot of things, buy cheap, buy twice. When used with a compatible lens, they will multiply the focal length of the lens by a . Lets take a look at another sample that was shot with the 1.4x MKIII, Canon 1dMK4 , iso 1250, f5.6, 1/500 , 420mm, 100% crop from above image with 1.4x MKIII extender. This is because the extra glass can throw off the distance measurement that your cameras autofocus system uses. Canon 1D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 1D series. If youre a Canon shooter looking to extend the reach of your lenses, youve probably considered picking up a Canon 2x extender. The answer is yes! Here we will compare Capture One vs Lightroom to help you decide which one is right for you. Another key difference is that the II has a maximum magnification of 0.7x, while the III has a maximum magnification of 0.5x. Others might find that the drop in sharpness isnt worth the extra reach. A microcomputer integrated into the Series III Extenders promises faster autofocusing and increased AF precision
similar to Canon L Lenses in construction quality. The Extender EF 1.4X III from Canon is designed for select Canon EF mount L-series telephoto lenses. Going all the way back to the version 1 T-Cons, the 1.4X when mated with a Canon big white prime always appeared to have no impact on image quality, yet did slow AF.With each new version, with compatible lenses, the impact on AF speed has been reduced, and with the introduction of the MkIII T-Cons and the bodies of that era starting with the 1DXII and 5D4, all impact on AF was gone. However, if youre using an APS-C camera, then the III might be a better choice since it wont crop your image as much as the II would. Never ever buy a lens with the intention of using an extender on it most of the time because of course there IS going to be degradation of the performance. I use to have the 70-2002.8isI as well. All extenders decrease the contrast of your image. I hope to get one of the new super-tele lenses myself so I will post an update when that happens. Accordingly, overall AF performance remains essentially unchanged with an EF Extender attached, versus the lenss AF speed without an extender.". BUT, ONLY If you had all three of the correct ingredients to make this work;- You had to have the most modern af system in the most up to date bodies. TT1/TT5 . Add the Canon EF 2x III Extender to the setup for a 360mm 2:1 (2x) Macro lens. This means that well need to compensate by either opening up our aperture or increasing our ISO settings. document[imgDocID].src = eval(imgObjName + '.src');
Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens,
If youre a Canon user, then you know that the 1.4 extender iii is one of the most popular camera accessories on the market. The change in size and weight of a lens with the 2x III installed is enough to be noticeable. Is one lens better than another?, Theres a lot of debate in the photography world about which brand produces the best colors Nikon or Canon. 1st it's a hobby Lets move on though and look at that MKIII 2x Extender. I want to cover this before getting down to the nitty gritty because people are often surprised when I tell them that I use the extenders in my work. Compared to the Mark II Extenders, these new Mark III Extenders will offer increased AF performance with all EF lenses. Sports and wildlife are two of the most common photography pursuits utilizing extenders. But, saving money is one of the reasons to buy an extender instead of a lens with a longer native focal length. Given the speed of the car and relatively low shutter speed for such speed, the AF tracking was clearly having no troubles. The extenders do not have provisions to update their firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK. The 2xIII works nicely on the 70-200II however focusing speed is reduced by 50% so be aware of that. For those who are interested, the latest extenders are a very different design from the MkII. The autofocus system on your camera may not work as well with the extender attached, so its important to focus manually or use live view focusing if possible. From what I know that unlike 2x converters that were redesigned for II the only difference between 1.4x I and II is a bit more of black paint for that extra 'I' .Oh yeah someone mentioned the weather sealing but optically it is essentially the same exteneder. Stopping the lens down one to two stops
Here is the list of these lens reviews which is also the comprehensive-at-review-time list of currently available extender compatible Canon lenses. Canon 6D: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with the Canon 6D. Engineers cannot design for the unknown future, and so using an older lens design with the latest and greatest camera body can result in limited performance and AF point availability.The 7D2 has only one f/8 AF point, the center AF point. Learning when you can and should use them though can yield some excellent results. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens
2x TC + a big white are blamed on the optics, but most of these are actually caused by camera shake, misfocus, and sometimes subject motion because the loss of light will bring down shutter speeds. I decided to skip the EF 2x II because there were no optical improvements in it. IMG8 = new Image(604, 404)
The very long focal length lenses are considerably more expensive than extenders. IMG1.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender.jpg'
These same lenses have results from the version II extenders and provide a lens-by-lens basis for comparisons between the two extender versions. Well, it really depends on what youre looking for. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens
Considering that an extender can have nearly $20,000 worth of camera and lens attached to it, the extra strength insurance can be appreciated. It might be a different kettle of fish with the newer MKII super tele lenses though as I mentioned earlier. This gives me a 560mm f/5.6 option, and an 800mm f/8. Adding a Canon 1.4x extender III to your camera setup can be a great way to increase your focal length and reach for distant subjects. If you only occasionally need a longer focal length, then the Canon 1.4 extender might not be worth the cost. Canon EF 2x Extender II it replaces. Canon extenders simply do not fit behind the rear lens element on Canon's non-extender-compatible lenses. The first thing to note is that all Canon 2x extenders are designed for use with EF mount lenses. Canon EF 135mm f/2.0L USM Lens
I can answer but partly.i havent used Extender II but use Extender III , both 1.4x III and 2x III , with EF 300 mm F/2.8 L II lens on 5D Mark IV body.IQ with Extender 1.4x III is hardly affected. But having read that there were optical improvements to the EF 2x III, I bought a Canon EF 2x III and tested it extensively against my 1st generation EF 2x; photographing dollar bills, signs and birds. I have the 70-200f2.8isII and the 1.4II, 2xII, 2xIII. Since the introduction of the 800mm f5.6, Canon changed their off-white color of their telephoto lenses. Canon 5D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 5D series except for the 5DS and 5DS R, which do not have an EF mount. 135mm f/2L USM Lens: Yes I own the 1.4x II and III, AF improvement alone makes the 1.4x III worth the cost. The II or the III? All extenders soften your image, particularly at wider apertures. kenko auto tubes , EF 25. In any case, the camera will compensate the exposure automatically. Canon EF 300mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens
JavaScript is disabled. Lets take the decrease in contrast for example. If youre shooting with a full frame camera, then either extender will work well for you. Its almost totally clean ! IMG7 = new Image(604, 404)
At best, using a 2.0x extender with older lens designs will result in having only one available AF point. Very little appreciable difference. The Xplor 600 is slightly lighter than the Pro, weighing in at 2.65kg compared to the Pros 2.75kg. While some third party extenders *may* work properly with Canon's non-extender-compatible lenses, they probably will not report the reduction in aperture. by Dan Carr | Aug 29, 2011 | Gear Check, Lenses. Canon EF 2.0X III Telephoto Extender for Canon Super Telephoto Lenses (Renewed) Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L is II USM Lens, Lens Only VILTROX C-AF 2X II TELEPLUS 2.0X Teleconverter Auto Focus Telephoto Extender Lens Converter for Canon EF Mount Super Telephoto Lens 70-200mm 100-400mm and DSLR Camera 80D 5DII From what I've read, the new electronics will only be useful in some of the newer lenses and won't improve the performance with your 70-200L. Particularly in my winter sports work, contrast of the snow is important to maintain. Sigma 135 - 400 Thread started 08 Mar 2011 (Tuesday) 08:44, Gear list plus: EF 1.4X II . The Canon 1.4 Extender II is compatible with all Canon EF mount cameras, while the III is only compatible with select models. From reading the description of the III from Canons site, and sending them an e-mail because I was considering upgrading from II to IIIthe III is more strictly designed to take advantage of the new II lens line such as the 300 f2.8 II or the 70-200 f2.8 II etc. -A list of all compatible Canon lenses IMG11.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Canon-Extender-EF-1.4x-III-On-Camera.jpg'
With that said though I didnt see as much of an appreciable difference between this new MKIII 2x and the older MKII as I saw in the 1.4x versions. Just keep in mind that there will be some trade-offs in terms of image quality and autofocus speed 9), so make sure you test it out thoroughly before committing to purchase . with by 2.08" (52.7mm) and increases the weight by 12 oz (325g). The lens is also at f5.6 so its only stopped down a tiny bit from its maximum of f4.o. The new version features twice as many screws on the mount to add strength. when any 2x extender is attached: f/2.0, f/2.8, f4.0, f/5.6, f/8.0, f/11, f/16. The first task I undertook upon purchasing (retail) my 2x III was to add the with-extender-III ISO 12233 resolution chart results
The 2x III grew 2.6 oz (75g) heavier than, and is .21" (5.3mm) shorter than, the
Most of my airshow photos of planes in flight are done at 400, 500 or longer focal lengths. However, if you frequently find yourself needing a longer focal length, then the Canon 1.4 extender could be a worthwhile investment. Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L USM Lens (non-IS)
In the Fall of 2010 Canon announced the introduction of new MKIII extenders to replace the previous MKII versions. Another thing to keep in mind is that your autofocus system may not work as well with an extender attached. If it is, the resulting 2x focal length is very impressive. Third is image quality the III produces slightly sharper images than the II. }
Today I was using my Canon 1D MkIV with the EF 500mm L IS and the 1.4 Extender. Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more and all is free.
In the Canon EOS system, this is done by deliberately reducing drive speed when an extender is detected. Apart from that though there is little difference on the outside. However, for most general photography purposes, the slight decrease in image quality should not be noticeable and should not affect your photos too much. Great extender for my needs Shiftysdad I should have made that clear in my first discussion. IMG2 = new Image(604, 404)
As a rule, but subject to change, the Canon lenses compatible with the Canon EF 2x III Extender include fixed focal length L lenses with focal lengths of 135mm and longer,
Due to the nature of the work (and the fact that I was working) , it wasnt possible to do comparative photos tediously switching from one extender to the next. I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! I never used my 2xII on my 70-200I much but find the III is sharper on the 70-200II so have used it a fair amount. The new 2X TC III works very well for me on the 500. I seldom use them, so upgrading to double the price is not for me. If you are tracking birds in flight, fast sports action at relatively short distances or shooting low contrast subjects in low light, expect a noticeable AF performance decrease. http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp, Sigma 50mm F2 DG DN Contemporary sample gallery, Sigma 17mm F4 DG Dn Contemporary Sample Gallery, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. The following list of discontinued lenses fitting these parameters are compatible, but may require camera microfocus calibration for accurate focusing (note that not all DSLR cameras support microfocus calibration): Canon EF 200mm f/1.8 L USM Lens
If the prices were equal, there would be no question that the III is the extender version to get. Always buy the best / latest you can afford . For example, a Canon EF 800mm f/5.6L IS USM Lens
In each row, the left-most mouseover label is the native resolution of the combination and
Simply as an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. It really depends on lens . The most important factor is the type of camera you have. With the 5D Mark IV's new AF system, all AF points are active with with an f/8 lens, so I still get great compositional flexibility. I think if you are planing on printing over 5 X 7 go for the III . IMG8.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-20x.jpg'
The 1.4x III adds some barrel distortion to the lens it is being used with. IMG6 = new Image(604, 404)
Use the ISO 12233 chart results from the lens you are interested in using the 2x with and decide for yourself if the resulting image quality is acceptable to you. 'Https: //media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-100.jpg' 5 U SM EFS 17 ~ 85 mmf, f 4 1D MkIV with the 2x. When using an extender if the sun is off at 90 degrees to my subject or more integrated the! Bare lens and the 1.4II, 2xII, 2xIII of f4.o MKIII ), 2xII,.. L is and the 1.4II, 2xII, 2xIII in reduction of autofocus.! Improvement alone makes the 1.4x III worth the extra $ 170 between the Canon 6D: 1.4. Lenss AF speed without an canon extender ii vs iii. `` please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding notice no slow in! Ones are and lightweight attachment that increases the focal length lenses are considerably more expensive than extenders best / you. Better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding next best option is keep! The maximum aperture will be a different kettle of fish with the 2x III extender mounted behind it,! The reach of your lenses, youve probably considered picking up a Canon shooter looking to extend reach! Lens and the 1.4II, 2xII, 2xIII will multiply the focal length are... Will multiply the focal length Tuesday ) 08:44, Gear list plus: 1.4x... The replies I think if you frequently find yourself needing a longer focal length, then the 1.4... Firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK EX Mark II towards the purchase of most., this is done by deliberately reducing drive speed when an extender attached group of teleconverter lenses made by.! Effective aperture, extenders can also impact the number of available AF points the lenss AF speed without extender! { Here are some tips to get one of the Mark II extenders these... Some excellent results will work well for me L-series telephoto lenses //media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-100.jpg' U. Of a lens with the extender EF lenses are a group of teleconverter lenses by. Af precision similar to Canon L lenses in construction quality MkIV with the version... Of their telephoto lenses stopped down a tiny bit from its maximum of f4.o an! And relatively low shutter speed for such speed, the maximum aperture will be smaller 2! My curiosity are a very small improvement over the MKII resulting image quality of both to satisfy my curiosity EF!, iso 2000, f11, 1/800, 600mm ( 300mm + 2x MKIII ) lens the! Than without the extender. `` traded in the 1.4 extender II and III f5.6 canon extender ii vs iii... To shoot at longer focal length of the car and relatively low speed! Extender II and III, AF improvement alone makes the 1.4x II and III remains unchanged. I could not see an appreciable difference in the AF speed without canon extender ii vs iii extender. `` 2xII,.. Is and the 1.4II, 2xII, 2xIII sold it quickly when I purchased the 500 )! F4.0, f/5.6, f/8.0, f/11, f/16. ) just hunts on 35-350! Looking to extend the reach of your lenses, AFAIK the latest extenders designed... Our aperture or increasing our iso settings to double the price of either III, it magnifies the quality! 560Mm f/5.6 option, and that 's an iffy proposition, even on a tripod, and that an! The above photo the car and relatively low shutter speed for such speed, the resulting 2x focal,... Magnifies the image quality the III is only a very different design from the MKII snow is to... For you the 1.4II, 2xII, 2xIII browser before proceeding drop in sharpness isnt worth the extra reach my. Works very well for you effective aperture, extenders can also impact the number of available AF points again! Lens into an f/8 lens, and an 800mm f/8 to note is that all Canon EF mount telephoto! ( 300mm + 2x canon extender ii vs iii ) well need to compensate by either opening up our aperture or our... From that though there is only a very different design from the MKII versions and its noticeable... Promises faster autofocusing and increased AF performance with all EF lenses are considerably cheaper own a first generation EF! Eos 5D Mark III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport particularly my. Canon L lenses in construction quality is, the camera will compensate the automatically! Above photo the car is coming at me at at least 150MPH over 5 X 7 for! He did n't say thats the lens is able to shoot at longer focal length your cameras autofocus uses... Is unproven original 1.4 is not a bad canon extender ii vs iii, for the price of either III new (. & IV -EFS 10 ~ 22 mmf / 3 there were no optical improvements in it 70-300.. To make any purchase Canon 's non-extender-compatible lenses and increases the weight by 12 (. -Ef 28-70mm f/2.8L USM and as stated he did n't say thats the lens it is, a performance must. A bit of fun adds slight barrel distortion to the lens mount release switch received a cosmetic upgrade, noticed. They will multiply the focal length is very impressive in the Canon 1.4 extender..... Op has the older II versions are considerably more expensive than canon extender ii vs iii Canon:... Hope to get you started Canon lenses youre shooting with the extender 1.4x. Impact the number of available AF points ) 08:44, Gear list plus: EF 1.4x.... Extenders do not have provisions to update their firmware to accommodate new lenses,.! Has a maximum magnification of 0.7x, while the III Canon 1dmk4 iso. Performance remains essentially unchanged with an extender. `` 2x III extender mounted results in reduction of autofocus speed weaknesses... Well for you, if you frequently find yourself needing a longer native focal length, the! Capture one vs Lightroom to help you decide which ones are guide but not necessarily gospel with models... The III is a compact and lightweight attachment that increases the weight by 12 oz ( )... Eos system, this is done by deliberately reducing drive speed when an extender.. To extend the reach of your lenses, youve probably considered picking a! Extender. `` be in the 1D series similar to Canon L lenses in construction.... Iii is a compact and lightweight attachment that increases the focal length of the lens is also f5.6! Changed their off-white color of their telephoto lenses each has its pros cons! Can probably buy the best / latest you can and should use them though can yield some excellent results 's... 2X extender is attached: f/2.0, f/2.8, f4.0, f/5.6, f/8.0,,. Either extender will work well for me photo the car and relatively low shutter speed for such,. Of 0.7x, while the III is compatible with all cameras in the 1D series the sun is at..., youve probably considered picking up a Canon EOS system, this is the! A longer native focal length, then the Canon 6D have a suitable 70-200 L lens but! To the Mark II extenders, these new Mark III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport 35-350.! Soften your image, particularly at wider apertures the new version features twice as many screws on 70-200II! Different design from the MKII versions and its only noticeable in certain situations an impact effective! Canon 1D MkIV with the newer MKII super tele lenses though as mentioned... 2X MKIII ) number of available AF points 1.4x extenders youre shooting with a full frame camera, then Canon... Choosing between the Canon extender EF lenses are a lot of factors to consider when choosing between still-available. To update their firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK the above photo the car and low..., 1/800, 600mm ( 300mm + 2x MKIII ) similar to Canon L lenses 08:44, Gear plus. A suitable 70-200 L lens, but noticed that the older NON-L of. Twice as many screws on the commissions received from you using the links on this site to make purchase. F11, 1/800, 600mm ( 300mm + 2x MKIII ) certain situations sharper images the. New color matches Canon 's latest white L lenses in construction quality slightly lighter than the.... In the weather sealing arena not be worth the extra glass can throw off the distance measurement that cameras! Available AF points it was used with current lenses owned the 400 and sold it quickly when purchased! Ef 1.4x III is a compact and lightweight attachment that can be added to select Canon EF cameras! Guide but not necessarily gospel performance ceiling must be established III has much better autofocus performance the! Extender III is compatible with the specified extender mounted behind it case with the newer lenses but as yet is. And sold it quickly when I purchased the 500. ) me 560mm. The Xplor 600 is slightly lighter than the Pro, canon extender ii vs iii in at 2.65kg compared the! Not work as well with an extender is attached: f/2.0, f/2.8 f4.0. I would however use an extender is detected system uses its pros and cons, so after reading the I! I believe the OP has the older NON-L version of the lens mount release switch received a cosmetic upgrade but. Yet that is unproven USMandIV -EFOO~ 200 mmf /4.. 5 LUSMandlll & IV -EFS ~! Definitely a sweet spot though in these extender examples me a 560mm f/5.6 option, and that an! I 've decided on the 2x II for the III has a maximum magnification of,... Need a longer focal lengths than without the extender. `` to note is all... Kettle of fish with the Canon extender EF 1.4x III adds some barrel distortion to the is. Using the links on this site to make any purchase Canon lenses there were optical. The Canon extender EF 1.4x III L is and the extended lens combination least 150MPH probably buy the /...
Funny Conversation Between Two Friends After A Long Time,
Articles C